PRINCE / “Family Name”

Welcome. You have just accessed the Akashic Records Genetic Information Division. This program is required for those wishing to attain a marriage blessing from the kingdom. When you wish to begin this program, place your right hand on the scanner and tightly clench up your butt cheeks as you might feel a slight electrical shock. … Please select the race history you desire. … You have selected ‘African-American.’ This is your history…. —Intro to Prince’s “Family Name”
Both Kiini and Kalamu (see the responses to last week’s “Don’t Play Me”) are under the impression that all of Prince’s post-Lovesexy work is uninspired and uninteresting. Oddly, they both admit that they haven’t been paying much attention either. It’s hard to defend that kind of position: “X is bad. Not that I know anything about X. But if I did know anything about X, I’m certain it would be bad. Therefore X is bad.”* Of course, it’s hard to attack that sort of position too…circular arguments are like that. prince 18.jpg Truth is, The Rainbow Children is Prince’s most cohesive and consistently enjoyable release since the classic 1987 double-album Sign O’ The Times. (Lovesexy fans are having fits right now, I’m sure.) Of course, you’d only know that if you’ve actually heard the thing and I’m not sure that many people—former Prince fans included—actually have. Some of it isn’t anyone’s fault really. Since becoming his own boss, Prince has released a good deal of music…ok, a shitload of music. What with the outtakes and live albums and fan-only releases and the whole thing with the symbol, it’s hard for even dedicated fans to figure out what the hell is going on. I’m not here to explain it all…I’m not even sure that I can. I am here to tell you that, if you ever did consider yourself a Prince fan, you owe it to yourself to pick up a copy of The Rainbow Children. Click the link—you can get it used for under three bucks. Most of you would be willing to drop that on a Starbucks Café Mocha. So save yourself the caffeine fit and the empty calories and get some funky music in your life. Six Reasons To Add The Rainbow Children To Your Prince Collection: 1. “Family Name” If you thought Prince’s new adherence to “sharing the truth and preaching the good news”—his words, not mine—would make his records sound like outtakes from a Sunday afternoon at the Kingdom Hall, “Family Name” shows you how wrong you are. “Family Name” might just be the most political track Prince ever recorded. It’s also one of the funkiest. The track opens with a fuzzed-out growl of a bassline backed by staccato drums and it keeps getting better from there. And I never thought I’d hear Prince lampooning slave auctioneers, Thomas Jefferson and Satan on the same track. Or at all. One other thing. At the beginning of the long mix (and video) of Prince’s 1985 hit “Raspberry Beret,” Prince pauses to clear his throat…loudly. I remember an interviewer asking him about that. Prince said he left the coughing in there “for sickness.” By which I assume he meant for levity. It’s to Prince’s credit that even in the midst of both a religious conversion and a political rant, Prince maintains enough of a sense of humor to identify the bridge of “Family Name” by calling out, ‘Bridge!’ See? He’s not just godly and funky and wealthy, he’s funny too. 2. “The Everlasting Now” This is one of those rare records that just makes you feel good. I don’t know if there actually was a party going on at Paisley Park when the little man and his band laid this track down, but it sure sounds like it. These days, I’m sure it was a PG-rated party, but hell, a party is a party, right? Besides, isn’t there something brilliantly anomalous about heathens like us (yes, I’m assuming) grooving unapologetically to lyrics like “accurate knowledge of Christ and the Father will bring the everlasting now”? 3. The mix The recording quality of this album, which I presume Prince himself had a hand in, is perfect. That’s higher praise than you’d think: 1995’s The Gold Experience is so harsh-sounding that the good songs grate my nerves as much as the bad ones do. A couple other mid-Nineties Prince albums (Come and Chaos & Disorder) have such a muddled and compressed sound that it’s hard to tell one instrument from another. (I’m convinced that both albums were a ‘fuck you’ to Warner Bros. With rare exceptions, the musical quality is on par with the recording quality. Meaning, both are atrocious.) But back to The Rainbow Children. Every note of this album is beautifully recorded—on a good system, the drums, piano, horns, etc. sound like they’re right in the room with you. More importantly, the musical quantity is such that you’re happy to have them there. 4. “Muse 2 The Pharaoh” I’ll be the first to admit that I have no idea what the hell Prince is talking about on this record. (“The opposite of NATO is ‘Aton.’” Umm…what?) I suspect Biblical significance—about which I know little—so I’ll reserve judgment on the lyrical content. As for the track, it’s gorgeous. Prince’s drummer John Blackwell has that sweet cymbal-ride thing going. The bassline is like one long, sweeping movement…graceful. I love this record. By the way, doesn’t ‘John Blackwell’ sound like some shit Prince just made up? Apparently not though. 5. “1+1+1 Is 3” OK, math wasn’t my strongest subject, so give me a minute. Prince + His Lady + Christ = ? [Counting my fingers and toes.] Yep, that’s three. Class is in session. prince 14.jpg 6. Pro-Black Prince? The album cover is done up in the style of classic Ernie Barnes (think Marvin Gaye’s I Want You or J.J.’s paintings on Good Times). It’s also the first time, that I’m aware of, that Prince used an all-black band. The various songs feature numerous references—or, at least, several references—to black pride and/or awareness. I’m not saying that Prince turned into Gil Scott-Heron. I’m not saying I want him to. I’m just saying it’s good to finally hear dude acknowledge that a hypothetical race-blind utopia might be a fabulously wonderful thing on paper or wax or whatever CDs are made of, but the truth is, we have to get by in the here and now, and in the here and now, shit is real. * I should add that Kalamu’s and Kiini’s positions are distinguishable by Kiini believing that Prince’s pre-Lovesexy work is inspired and interesting. —Mtume ya Salaam        Rainbow Children Reaches for a Higher Musical Mantle     First, if you are looking for a CD filled with nicely cut-and-packaged hit singles that are radio and Billboard friendly, The Rainbow Children ain’t for you.  However, if you are looking for a diversified musical experience with lyrics that take you further than the sheets, then The Rainbow Children is up your alley.  The biggest knock on Prince’s latest efforts is that his albums sound incoherent because the songs stop and go with no specified direction.  The truth, however, is that his albums are coherent, and they do have direction; it is just that the direction is not toward Billboard, nor is he attempting to craft songs that are easily packaged for radio.  No, Prince’s direction has been to become the best musician and lyricist that he can, which often means to stretch pass the charts, to juxtapose notes, sounds, chords, and other musical and lyrical ideas that produce—God forbid!!!—something...different!?!  Many see Prince as one who has ceased to fulfill his potential.  On the contrary, The Rainbow Children is proof that Prince continues to fulfill his potential.  It is just that he never saw hit records as the “be all—end all” of his potential. Most of the songs on the album have at least three musical movements.  These multiple movements become a motif, as Prince continues to be one of the best in the pop field to use sound as a metaphor.  For instance, in “The Work, Pt. 1” he is noticeably using a James Brown-inspired riff that echoes soulful Black Power semantics, which he laces with lyrics about the “hard” but necessary “work” that needs to be done for “revelation to come to pass.”  The music sets a mood of the Black Power struggle, then Prince infuses his notions of a metaphysical struggle, which exists along side the physical struggle.  “Every time I watch the other people’s news / I c a false picture of myself, another one of u / They try 2 tell us what we want, what 2 believe / Didn’t that happen in the Garden / When somebody spoke 2 Eve?”  This connecting the black struggle to the metaphysical is quite essential to Prince’s own theory, as evidenced by how he uses the term “Devil” throughout the CD to refer to the physical devils who exploit people for their wages.  He then uses those physical devils as a trope for the metaphysical “Devil” in “Rainbow Children” and “Muse 2 the Pharaoh” because in Prince’s theory the ultimate battle is in the metaphysical realm and not the physical realm, as also evidenced by “Digital Garden” and “The Everlasting Now.”  On one level, the multiple movements create a trope for Prince and his inability to be confined to arbitrary categories.  On another level, the multiple movements represent his need to continue to grow, searching for the sound or idea to take him to the next level.  As he states in “Last December,” which has the most drastic musical changes and movements, “Did u ever find a reason Y u had 2 die? / Or did u just plan on leaving / Without wondering y?...In ur life did u just give a little / Or did u give all that u had? / Were u just somewhere in the middle / Not 2 good, not 2 bad?”  The musical movements combine with questioning lyrics to echo the desire of the jazz musicians, such as Sun Ra, who wanted to show that within the soul of the music was a desire to go somewhere and become something that transforms us.  Thus, the lyrics of The Rainbow Children are pointing the listener in a direction, and the music is acting as a guide. For the first two-thirds of the CD, Prince is challenging our notions of what a “pop” song can be by challenging the conventions of what sounds can be combined.  While the first few songs are held on our musical radar by well measured/regulated beats and a soul-like mesh of hypnotic keyboards, Prince takes from that line and constructs grooves in various directions, attempting to expand himself and what we know as “popular music.”  Again, this expansion serves as a trope that works as a backdrop for what the lyrics want to do, which is to destroy our archaic understanding of what it means to be man and woman, what it means to be human, what it means to be living in truth, which also reflects in what it means to make art.  He begins with a creation song, as all good myths do, but his creation begins with the fall and then redemption of mankind in “Rainbow Children.”  “With the accurate understanding of God and His Law they went about the work of building a new nation: The Rainbow Children.”  Playing on the myth of Osiris and Iris and Adam and Eve, Prince asserts that the new nation will only be created if we are able to build constructive relationships between man and woman.  “As prophesied, the Wise One and his woman were tempted by the Resistor.  He, knowing full well the Wise One’s love 4 God, assimilated the woman first and only.  Quite naturally, chaos ensued and she and 5 others were banished from the Rainbow...4ever.”  This ideology is nothing new for Prince, for man’s fall from grace and salvation have always been linked directly to man’s relation to woman, most notably in “And God Created Woman” and in a more secular sense in “Raspberry Beret” and “Forever in my Life,” where it is the female who has the power to fertilize man’s life.  In fact, he affirms this by invoking a line from a much older tune, “Sexuality,” with “Reproduction of the new breed leader Stand up and organize!”  This line affirms that Prince is using sex as a metaphor for metaphysical union and that sexuality is a trope of human identity.  The following songs continue to pontificate over the fall and redemption of mankind.  The music acts as a guide, continually changing the mood as the lyrics take us down a sundry of issues and solutions.  The songs are an amalgamation of jazz, with an avant-garde sensibility, where Prince pushes the instruments to their limits of sound, hoping his moving in various musical directions will push the listener to free his mind and become open to the messages. prince 15.jpg The Rainbow Children is avant-garde in that it is pushing and questioning what we know as truth and beauty in the sense of pleasing music and gratifying ideology.  It is not avant-garde in the sense of “wanting to be art for the sake of art.”  Prince is too influenced by black musicians to think of art outside the context of man’s daily existence, even if his inclusion of the metaphysics has put him at odds with what has been on the charts for the past ten years.  Working with the definitions provided by Walter Davis in his essay, “So You Wanna Be An Avant-Garde Fan,” The Rainbow Children is avant-garde in the sense that the “Freebop” of Ornate Coleman, the “Expressionism” of Coltrane, “Restructualism,” and the “Post-Modernism” of Wynton Marsalis all come together to serve as aspects and foundations of what the term “avant-garde” meant to the artists who were working within that certain framework.  In accordance, the music of The Rainbow Children seeks to open alternative musical pathways and ideas that are then articulated through the lyrics. In “1+1+1 is 3” Prince asserts, “As she fell in2 the Sensual Everafter, out of body / out of mind, he stroked her hair a hundred times.  And as she fell deeper in2 the hypnotic unwind, he counted his way in2 the suggestive mind.  Planting a seed that bears fruit on the tree, he said, ‘repeat after me...1+1+1 is 3.’”  Falling in love is not an ending to a journey it is the seed to our higher, metaphysical journey.  Thus, love is about possibilities as jazz and funk are about possibilities as evolution is about meeting and fulfilling all of life’s possibilities.  Throughout the CD, the songs interact in a circular call-and-response manner, where the emotion of urgency and the notion of a quest are amplified by the experimental fusion of varying sounds.  On top of the silhouetted jazz grooves, Prince coordinates funk, soul, and gospel in a manner that shows both the brilliance of black music as well as the innate and organic link that black music has to spirituality in all of its forms. Just when you have slipped into the experimental form of this album, he hits you with “Family Name,” which is classic Prince: classic in that Prince is able to take what he has done in the past and evolve it into where he is now...classic in that it’s Prince’s electrified, thumping bass line beneath his piercing falsetto...classic in that it’s Sly and the Family Stone meets Curtis Mayfield, and at the end of this meeting, the song explodes into Prince making his case that he is the best guitarist of his time, which he proves later in the final movement of “Last December.”  “Family Name” is about the fallacy of the oppressor’s story and how this fallacy is used to oppress the Children of the Rainbow. “First of all, the term ‘black and white’ is a  fallacy.  It simply is another way of saying ‘this or that’...‘this’  means the truth, or ‘that’ which is resistant 2 it.  When a minority realizes its similarities on a higher level not just  ‘black’but  PEOPLE OF COLOR, and higher still ‘INDIGENOUS,’ and even higher still, ‘FROM THE TRIBE OF’and yet higherthe ‘RAINBOW CHILDREN’...When  this understanding comes, the so-called minority becomes a majority in the wink of an eye.  This action will cause a Reaction or  Resistance.  The source of this Resistance must b banished as it is in direct conflict with the initial action. It cannot b assimilated, 4 its very nature is resistance.  In other words, ONE CANNOT SERVE 2 MASTERS.  U r either ‘this’ or ‘that’ which is not ‘this.’” prince 19.jpg “Family Name” climaxes right into “The Everlasting Now,” where the album shifts into overdrive, leaving us with the question, “What the hell happened to the direction of first part of this album?”  Where jazzy soul was the dominate form of the first two-thirds, funk dominates the last third.  As with the other songs on this album, “The Everlasting Now” has at least two musical movements—three, depending on how you are counting.  Again, it is the funk chords and the refrain of “Don’t let nobody bring you down!” that drive this groove, which is seconded by the horns that come late into the jam, which, in one final movement, shifts into James Brown cookin’ with Jimi Hendrix at 2:30 a.m.  With the lyrics, Prince is once again employing the metaphoric “I” as a way to connect the individual to the collective.  Many of the verses seem quite true to his personal story, but he uses the impressionistic style best seen in Around the World in a Day or in “Sacrifice of Victor” from 1992’s “Symbol [O(+>]” cd, which allows his novel to assert the universal.  Prince is continuing his theme of freedom and liberation and his ability to link that theme with the collective, moving from a focus on the individual to a focus on the masses.  He is definitely talking about his liberation from Warner Bros. and from a world that he sees as based on entropy, but he is also using his personal as a metaphor for liberating the masses with truth. “Mirror, mirror what u c? / Have I still got those dark clouds over me? / Or am I really feeling what I feel? / The last days of the Devil’s deal / Mirror what u c?/ Devil, devil what u know?/ U been here since 1614, but now u got 2 go / U been hidin’ behind corporate eyes / U wanna war, but u can’t fight / Devil u got 2 go...Teacher, teacher what u say? / Did we really come over in a boat? / Did it really go down that way? / Or did I arrive b4 u and ruin Thanksgiving Day? / Teacher, what u say?” Driving The Rainbow Children is the notion that the songs are meant to please and enlighten—to move both our bodies and our souls in a positive direction.  Prince bookends the CD with love because, in his theory, only love can save us.  The first song, “Rainbows Children,” concentrates on the love between man and woman.  The last song, “Last December,” concentrates on the love between God and mankind.  “Did u love somebody / But got no love in return? / Did u understand the real meaning of love / That it just is and never yearns?  When the truth arrives / Will u b lost on the other side? / Will u still b alive? / In the name of the Father / In the name of the Son / We need 2 come 2gether / Come 2gether as one.”   The motif is still liberationthe liberation that has been there since day onebut now Prince has successfully merged his desire for individual liberation with the necessity of collective liberation.  And this liberation must take place in the metaphysical before we can achieve physical liberation.  With the insight of Stevie Wonder, The Rainbow Children is able to construct a theology of George Clinton’s “Free your mind and your ass will follow,” and the music is another lesson in just how spacious the spectrum of music can be if we allow it to be all that it has the potential to become. —C. Liegh McInnis       Check back in a couple of weeks        Although I’m not overly impressed with the tracks Mtume dropped here on BoL, I ordered The Rainbow Children and will have an opinion in a couple of weeks once I’ve received it and listened to it. Rock-based pop has never appealed to me. I know that’s part of why Prince’s music in general doesn’t turn me on. But if two major Prince fans say this is one of Prince’s best, I will listen... I will add this one note: listen to the end of Prince’s live version of "Nothing Compares 2 U" in the jukebox. Listen to what he says in the epilogue, "...ultimately what you find out is that ain’t none of us really free." —Kalamu ya Salaam          Not even close to his best        I didn’t say The Rainbow Children was one of Prince’s best. I said it was his best since Sign O' The Times. Given that Sign O' The Times was Prince’s ninth album, that makes a big difference. If I had to make a Top Ten list of Prince’s best albums, it would go like this:
1. Sign O’ The Times (1987) 2. Dirty Mind (1980) 3. 1999 (1982) 4. Parade: Music From Under The Cherry Moon (1986) 5. Around The World In A Day (1985) 6. Purple Rain (1984) 7. Controversy (1981) 8. The Rainbow Children (2001) 9. Lovesexy (1988) 10. Emancipation (1996)
You can see where The Rainbow Children falls. It’s a damn good Prince album, but as good as it is, it’s not even close to his best. But I have to say, Baba, you’re wasting your time to even put it in your CD player. Clearly, you’re just not feeling Prince. And that’s cool. Like they say, everything ain’t for everybody. —Mtume ya Salaam  

This entry was posted on Sunday, October 29th, 2006 at 1:40 am and is filed under Contemporary. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


3 Responses to “PRINCE / “Family Name””

mrG Says:
October 30th, 2006 at 10:20 am

“Free at last, free at last, thank God Almighty we’re free at last” — ‘best’ is a very subjective metric, fraught with ego and expectation, attachment and, yes, exactly what Prince says here: Resistance.

Sun Ra once said that it was wrong what was happening with afro-american music, that ‘soul’ music wasn’t about your soul, it was BODY-music. And, Ra said, that focus was destroying people, chaining them to a doomed planet. I’ve only heard this one track, but for the first time I hear Prince wrestling with the reality that music is a uni-versal language, and realizing that what he says speaks directly to the creation and the creator and tells the universe who we are and why we do what we do. Prince is discovering the power of this goddess we call music and I think that is a good thing.

Even if he’s only now taking baby steps, the reason “teletubbies” was such a success was because the toddlers could relate, they could aspire to go where the tubbies would talk them, it wasn’t looking at the vast gulf of time-space between babbling and the eloquence of Mr Rogers (of which very few of us could ever hope to match), it wasn’t like the gulf between Gimme Your Love and Interstellar Lo-Ways, it was achievable, reachable, and in that, inspirational.

Maybe, just maybe that will be the effect of this new woken Prince, free at last from the expectations of ‘soul’ and ‘funk’ and all those other chains of family names.


masbas Says:
October 31st, 2006 at 9:56 pm

This is CLASSIC PRINCE. A MASTERPIECE.


E Says:
September 2nd, 2008 at 1:18 pm

i love PRINCE 🙂


Leave a Reply



| top |